Archive for June, 2009


Lately I have been deploying a lot of PCs at work. Before deployment every PC has to be updated. So of course among the important updates we also find internet Explorer 8. Every time I have to disable that update from installing. And I am doing that for good reasons. When Microsoft decided to climb from IE6 to 7 many installed it and they all got burned because it was full of bugs. Now I don’t know who and how MS decided to Put IE8 as an important update. But what I would really like to do, is to meet the man or the team responsible for that “brilliant” idea.

Sometimes I am trying to think the way he reached the conclusion to actually add IE8 to the important update section. There is multiple versions running in my head, and I will share them with the few that might stumble upon this.
One is the like this: Since IE7 was such a shitty browser the enlightened at Microsoft had a meeting, because, let’s assume IE was losing ground to other browsers and that would be unacceptable because this could lead to an eventual crash of MS itself, BOHOHOHooowaaaahh (this trying to be a ghostly scary sound). HOW? Well it’s complicated but let’s fable that Mozilla or some other company that already has a kick ass browser out there comes up with an OS that is going to revolutionize the OS world. Let’s take it to another level and say that it will be like the hero that saves the nation from the oppressing oligarchy… LOL. Then because IE7, everyone will say enough of this shit, we want the hero OS with their kick ass browser that never has problems. And there it is the beginning of the MS’s doom. If you look MS is actually giving freely windows 7 to people that purchased windows Vista. IE8 come to save their ass from IE7 blunder. To me this looks like a big cover up, or mass memory erasure. Because is recently after Win Vista, and it reminds of the Windows 98 and 98 second edition. That is the problem with these people, they are unreliable from one version to another. And that is not that appealing. I remember in the good old days when shit worked flawlessly and companies stuck with their reputation. Yea the good old days. Bs I ‘m just messin, I don’t know shit about the good old days I’m not that old.

Another idea is that the managers of windows update and whoever else, gathered and brainstormed. And as a practical joke they said how can we mess with the users? And some guy said: I know we can put IE8 as an important update. My assumption is that IE8 has to be buggy as hell too. Wasn’t IE7? What can we expect with IE8? So they said, brilliant, just brilliant and that is how IE8 became an Important Update and I have to disable that poop every time when I update a new computer.

Now my question to the people at Windows Update is: WTF were you thinking? I am sick and tired of people making decisions for other people and ME. Putting IE8 as an important automatic update is a matter of preference not a matter of security. If they really care about our safety, and not their pockets, they should’ve created a patch with the security features, not a whole new god damn edition of Internet Explorer.

There should be a universal or federal LAW out there that strictly regulates when the version change is allowed. Something like when more than 50% of the features on original software have changed then it is allowed for a version change from 6.1 to 6.2 or something like that. A major version revision from IE6 to IE7 should NOT just be, because it has added tabbed browsing capabilities 5 years later after everybody else, and they still didn’t get it right. IE7 was horrible. The major revision should be after a 90% – 100% change of the original product. And now they add the IE8 to Important Updates, OH HELL NO.

By the way, I am still using IE6 and it is still alive is kicking.

I was looking on New Egg’s website and among other things I found this $3000 video card. Well this is $3000 at the time of the writing, but who knows what it will be in 6 months. Nevertheless I am very curious how would this thing work out in a computer and what type of games can it render and how well. I have been out of the PC games for a while and I lost touch with what’s out there in terms of  graphics. I guess the older one grows he or she can no longer take uncomfortable PC chair. We move to consoles and the couch.

Here is a link to New Egg’s site: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133253

Anyway if any one of you have such a monster of a video card tell the rest of us how is it working.

XBOX 360 vs PS3

I have been dragged in this by my colleagues who have PS3s. They kneeled by them and they pledged their undying love and allegiance from the first day they acquired them. Over time I found the excuse in the blue ray player to buy myself one too. Since then I had countless discussions about which of the two systems is better.

I am going to list a series of problems with the systems so everyone will be in the know.

HARDWARE CONFIGURATION:

The PS3: Wireless capabilities out of the box, blue ray player, faster CPU, and HDMI. I don’t want to hear comments that some Xboxes come with HDMI now, mine doesn’t have one.
The XBOX loses the hardware aspect compared with PS3 especially that ALL Xboxes get the ring of fire and they have to be shipped for repairs.

The controllers are for both OK. I tend to like better the Xbox controller because is larger and feels more comfortable in my hands.

SOFTWARE CAPABILITIES:

The PS3: The ability to install a Linux based OS like Yellow dog Linux, or Ubuntu gives the PS3 a big plus, especially that you can use Linux to rip Blue-Ray DVDs. PS3 also has the Home game, a social type a game that players can meet and chat online, which diversifies the software capabilities out of the box for PS3. Also the PS3 network added that world news and weather feature. The protein folding is good but it should be made so that the ps3 launches it as a screensaver when idle, and it should be able to run in the background when we are watching a movie, but is not. Because I am not willing to let my PS3 running, which is a power hungry monster, just for Folding@home.

The XBOX: On the software side the XBOX OS is much finer tuned than the PS3. The transitions from the OS to the game is done smooth and without sound glitches or screen flickers. The fade in and out from game to OS and vice versa are perfect. The glitches are noticeable on the PS3 for people that use the HDMI feature. The XBOX allows for background downloads whereas the PS3 doesn’t and it is annoying to wait there for fifteen minutes until a random game download finishes.

ONLINE :

From the online game mode the XBOX live is superior to PS3 network because of quality. In the first place the headset dialogues are much clearer on Xbox live. On PS3 the dialog is constantly breaking up. The draw back on XBOX live would be the fee, but really analyzing this feature I really wish that PS3 would have a monthly fee if their network quality would become superior. In addition the Netflix feature with Xbox live really kicks ass with the exception that Netflix has mostly shitty movies on instant watch. Maybe we will see a Blockbuster and Sony coalition.

Another thing that the PS3 seems to have better than the XBOX is the new type of controller similar to the wii-mote. I know that the XBOX project Natal looks good but I doubt that it really works. And I really hated the British commentator the way he was glorifying that little virtual boy like it was the “Never Ending Story”, fuck that. In addition the demo videos they had with the games where the whole family is part of one game, seems like a lot of BS. Because I am not willing to wait there until my friend enters the pit stops so I can change the tires. That’s silly.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.